Lokkii BBQ Bricks – the convenience of gas with the flavor of charcoal – sort of, but not really
Consisting of individually wrapped bricks that are perfectly sized, Lokkii is a new kind of bbq fuel that looks like it has been custom designed for the Cobb.
Copied from the manufacturers website is the following list of claims:
Fast, Clean, Green.100% Organic.Ignites instantly.Burns for a minimum of 2 hours at 11,500 BTUs.Ready to cook in 12-15 minutes.Same original BBQ flavor without the chemical after taste.Easy to pack and carry.ndividually vacuum sealed for organics preservation.No ignition fuels needed.
I decided to test the product in the Cobb and purchased a pack from Canadian Tire.
The product is nicely packaged and I particularly like the fact that each brick is individually vacuum sealed.
Probably the greatest downside of this product is the fact that it is not at all as easy to light as the manufacturer claims – as a matter of fact I found it impossible to light without using Strike-a-Fire or Zip starter matches!
I have heard from people who had the same difficulties lighting the brick and I have also heard others say that it lid very easily, so maybe the quality varies from one batch to the other?
When it ligths, the built-in “fire starter” burns very intensively for a minute or two, but the fuel still takes about 15 minutes to get ready, which is not much different from regular charcoal.
The manufacturer claims same original bbq flavor withoug the chemical after taste. In my opinion this fuel does not impart much flavor at all, so if you like the flavor of bbq – you will have to add it by using wood chips or pellets with it. The smell is not offensive, but not what I would call typical smell of bbq.
The claimed cooking time of 2 hours is fairly accurate. I found the Lokkii fuel to be not quite hot enough for searing of steaks, but suitable for roasting and cooking that requires less intensive heat.
Price is also an issue – $4.99 for 2 bricks, which works out to about $2.50 per meal – compared to the cost of regular charcoal which is probably closer to 50 cents when used in a Cobb grill.
I guess that you have already come to the conclusion that I am no great fan of this product – and that would be true. However, it is not all bad, there are obvious advantages that should be mentioned.
Air and waterproof packaging makes it well suited for use on boats or as a part of the emergency preparedness kit that we are all supposed to have.
The packaging also makes the product much cleaner to handle than regular charcoal.
For those who are like me, enjoying the flavor of real bbq, stick with real charcoal.

Lokkii bbq fuel
nice seeing you blogging johan.
it claims that is a nitrate-free but lab analysis shows otherwise.
an amateur video here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjKiPnvjl_Q
romy,
What lab analysis ??? please provide proof.
No point in making wild accuasations,unless you have a hidden agenda.
hi abe
no hidden agenda and wild accusation here. there is no point and there will never be. just stating the fact that the claimed of “nitrate-free” by the producer were not true at all and that’s according to reputable french lab.
Romy,
If you are stating a fact, then provide the proof…simple.
If you are not prepared to do so,suggest you cease to make rediculous and unfounded accussations
RAPPORT D’ESSAIS
DOUAI, le 11 novembre 2009
Votre lettre : D.A du 19/08/2009
Avis d’expédition : Devis 22783 rév.0
A l’attention de
Echantillon(s) : Références SOCOR: D098510
Vos références: DIVERS
D098510: BBQ Briquette LOKKI (qté:1)
Echantillon prélevé par vos soins nous est parvenu le 21/08/2009
Les résultats d’analyses sont les suivants :
Echantillon D098510
Prise en charge échantillon
* Humidité totale et Matières sèches (NF EN 14346 – A ou B)
méthode A (étuve)
Humidité 2.8 %
Matière sèche 97.2 %
méthode B (Karl Fischer)
Teneur en eau /
Matière sèche /
Préparation et homogénéisation de l’échantillon
refus de broyage 0 %
Les résultats suivants sont exprimés sur le produit sec (hors refus de broyage éventuel)
extraction aqueuse
Nitrates extraits (par C.I.) (NF EN ISO 10304-2)
1010 mg/kg
La reproduction de ce rapport d’essais n’est autorisé que sous la forme d’un fac similé photographique intégral. Le rapport d’essais ne concerne que les échantillons soumis à l’essai.
A. FRANQUENOUILLE ou C.LAMBRE
Directeur du laboratoire adjoint Directeur du laboratoire
Romy,
WHY HAS IT TAKEN YOU TWO DAYS TO FURNISH SO CALLED CERTIFICATE??
I do not speak or read French,please provide name of laboratory and appropriate contact names,telephone numbers and or email address.Need to validate this report.
I’m sure the manufacturers of Lokkii and their lawyers will be most interested in the outcome.
Romy
I just read your so called report , being an industrial chemist ,I actually broke down the briquette as was most curious to see what made the briquette light , their are no nitrates in the briquette ,I think the nitrates are in your imagination .
Do you actually know what are nitrates? Nitrates are esters of nitric acid and alcohols formed by nitroxylation. I believe the alcohol from your so called nitrates has entered into your bloodstream
Your attempt to discredit a great product is pretty amateurish.
I agree with Abe comment ,I would want to have deep pockets if the manufacturer decided to take some course of action.
Jake I smell b*llsh*t here industrial chemist my ass – more like googler http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitrate …. They are the esters of nitric acid and alcohols formed by nitroxylation….
I am not an environmental chemist but I am a a Principal Geo-environmental Specialist, with 7 years working in an industrial lab.
I deal with environmental lab analysis on a daily basis, mainly for contaminants such as heavy metals, organics and anions. I do read french and there is no reason to suspect that the certificate if anything other than genuine.
Lokkii also claim that only the ignition layer contains no nitrates – nothing about the fuel layer. Att the end of the day these are nothing more than anthracite / charcoal briquettes and will produce polutants NOx, SOx, CO2 in line with their constituent parts. Anthracite is far more poluting than charcoal, when burnt and only reaches its optimal efficiency for combustion in a moving or vibrating grate boiler type system, not in a domestic barbq.
Mushii
“Le rapport d’essais ne concerne que les echantillons soumis a l’essai.”
You can see more about that?